Pro-Gun Vs. Anti-Gun: Is There Middle Ground?

Share
Embed
  • Published on Feb 21, 2018
  • Want to be in the next season of Middle Ground? We're always checking out submissions to our casting form! Submit yourself here: bit.ly/MIDDLEGROUND
    Pro-gun and anti-gun people came together to see if it's possible to find middle ground on an issue as polarizing as gun rights, especially in light of mass-shootings in America. SUBSCRIBE for more! 👉bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEjubilee 👈
    🙏Sharing is caring! 🙏
    You would help Jubilee SO MUCH by sharing this video with friends. To everyone who shares our videos with the world, we appreciate you more than you know. Thank you to all our amazing subscribers!
    | ABOUT |
    Jubilee exists to bridge people together and inspire love through compelling stories. We create shareable human-centric videos that create connection, challenge assumptions, and touch the soul.
    Ultimately, we aim to inspire people to LIVE GREATER.
    | SOCIAL |
    Jubilee Facebook: facebook.com/jubileemedia
    Jubilee Twitter: twitter.com/jubileemedia
    Jubilee Instagram: instagram.com/jubileemedia
    Jubilee Website: www.jubileemedia.com
    Jubilee MERCH: www.jubileegear.com
    If you'd like to be in future Middle Ground episodes, check out this form: tinyurl.com/MiddleGroundS2
    Support the Stoneman Douglas Shooting Victims:
    www.gofundme.com/stonemandouglasvictimsfund
    Help us caption & translate this video!
    amara.org/v/es0J/
  • EntertainmentEntertainment

Comments • 26 684

  • ZestyMel0n 13
    ZestyMel0n 13 Minute ago

    I like guns but we definitely need more strict policies, good discussions like this, and education. the fact that someone can walk to Walmart and get one no problems asked is pretty insane.

  • Julian Antuna
    Julian Antuna Hour ago

    Like all laws... there should be a middle ground. Have guns but regulated to be kept out of the wrong hands. Unfortunately there are individuals of the "pro gun" crowd that believe the "give an inch take a mile" argument that is just leaving everyone in a stalemate.

  • Nat X
    Nat X Hour ago +2

    Why is Rick against guns if he killed so many walkers with them

  • Giraffe From Africa
    Giraffe From Africa 2 hours ago +1

    Lol I would like too see someone try to buy something from a gun show without a background check and proper licensing.

  • Giraffe From Africa
    Giraffe From Africa 2 hours ago

    Can someone who’s anti gun explain to me why some of my favorite guns to shoot are banned in states like Massachusetts and California

  • Shit Noone Ever Said
    Shit Noone Ever Said 3 hours ago

    How do expect to have a productive conversation if you aren't willing to go into it with an open mind. I want you to change your mind but I am not willing to offer you that same curtesy. Basically everyone says no to the first question. Doesn't matter what the conversation is about now. Everyone just wasted their time.

  • Benny Oaks
    Benny Oaks 7 hours ago +1

    Pro gun. Shall not be infringed. I have no idea why the people that advocate the murder of millions of babies a year, feel like they should be able to dictate gun rights. The ability to walk into an abortion clinic knowing you are about to end an innocent life, is exactly the same as being able to walk into a crowded place and commiting mass murder. It's the ability to turn off that part of your mind, or block that part of your soul so you can do it with no remorse. So if you want to have the moral highground, and abortion. I promise you I will hand over my guns if that happens.

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 3 hours ago

      Or you know...people just understand that it isn't a baby and that it's terminating in most cases a non-sentient parasite.
      Listen, I'm pro gun, but you make us look bad when you drag in things like abortion.

  • Darby Sabini
    Darby Sabini 11 hours ago

    4:11 ”i think we all should step forward for this”
    Umm, chief?

  • Alec Burley
    Alec Burley 11 hours ago +1

    I bet literally every anti gun and gun show loophole promoter has never been to a gun show or even shot a gun. Ignorance is often mistaken for fear.

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 3 hours ago

      As someone who has been to many gunshows and is very pro-gun, the "gun show loophole" just refers to the ability to buy a gun at a show without a background check. And it exists. It just isn't a loophole nor is it restricted to shows

  • I_look dumber_in_person
    I_look dumber_in_person 21 hour ago +1

    Where are these groups formed? The pro gunner didn't seem to know some facts..... There's already background at gun shows. A reporter was denied trying to prove the myth of gun show loop holes. Btw, the reporter had a domestic violence conviction.

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 3 hours ago

      Not necessarily. Depends on who and where you buy the gun. The loophole refers to a private sale at a show, which you do not need a background check for.

  • MrdotIsaac
    MrdotIsaac 22 hours ago

    3:00 I think that was the most telling moment.

  • Gunner F
    Gunner F Day ago +1

    If they take away guns bad people are still going to have guns so we won’t have anything to protect ourselves

  • That Guy Bob
    That Guy Bob Day ago +1

    Stricter gun laws and/or a licensing system would save lives

    • Lizzie Allen
      Lizzie Allen 21 minute ago

      +That Guy Bob Seriously? 'Explain to me how I get a gun illegally'? You think pedophiles have a hard time finding child porn since it's illegal?

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 3 hours ago

      +That Guy Bob The fact remains that states and areas that allow open carry have fewer mass shootings and gun homicides than those that have strict gun laws.
      Not only that, but most "gun deaths" are suicide and accidental discharge. Not homicide.
      By the way, there is no law against drinking while pregnant. It just isn't advised.

    • That Guy Bob
      That Guy Bob 3 hours ago

      +TombWraith If you're gonna keep comparing stricter gun laws to prohibition, you won't convince me at all. Prohibition banned alcohol, I'm not talking about banning guns. The gun policy you're advocating for would be like if we had zero age restriction on alcohol, and you can have it when pregnant

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 3 hours ago

      +That Guy Bob No, I do have an argument, and that is why gun legislation has been continuously shot down. Because we don't have a gun problem here. The media only tells you we do.

    • That Guy Bob
      That Guy Bob 4 hours ago

      +TombWraith In other words you don't have an argument lmao

  • Zoe Wolf
    Zoe Wolf Day ago

    My boyfriend and I have been going through every single one of these videos and listening to each side. We have been having some amazing conversations and these videos have opened our eyes to different sides! Thank you so much for creating such great content!

  • Andrew Hatton
    Andrew Hatton Day ago

    How in armed people are gonna take unarmed people’s guns

  • StoneCold Sweden

    Adaeze obviously doesnt know how purchase a firearm

  • Moriarty
    Moriarty Day ago

    when I read the comments, the thing that upsets me the most is how many people see to have given up on society/humanity in general, writing stuff like: "it doesn't matter what you try, you will never be able to stop gun violence" etc. How about coming up with solutions for a change? Because there actually are, societies can change for the better, history has shown us that. I mean we are humans for f**** sake, we invented planes, medicine, we even flew to the moon. I am convinced that we can find solutions for gun violence, as well, if we set our minds to it.

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla Day ago

      How about reading the comment by Silver Mist below. Mankind has attempted to ban numerous things in the past - drugs, alcohol, etc.. In every instance people still obtained what they wanted while it ultimately drove further crime and violence. That is not to say there is nothing to be done. It rather demonstrates the difference between people who try to visualize a idyllic fantasy world vs. those who exist in reality and as such temper their "wants" with obtainable goals. Gun violence is not a result of firearms. It is driven by criminality and mental illness = while those things are perpetuated as a result of human nature and cultural mores. So if you really want to deal with gun violence = focus less on "da gun" and more on the individual pulling the trigger or reside yourself to the reality that you can pass all the laws you want and criminals will continue to ignore them and still obtain firearms. This is not Star Trek = it's the real world.

  • Silver Mist
    Silver Mist Day ago +3

    Banned alcohol....prohibition......start of speak easys
    Drug ban....drugs still a problem today
    Ban guns an no way you can convence me that someone who *wants* a gun won't get one. People find their ways. It just how world works.

  • Alisha420
    Alisha420 Day ago +1

    If they tried to take people's guns it would literally start a war within our country. Where I live people don't do nothing but hunt and fish collect guns, knives and ammo GOOD LUCK with all that digging😅

  • Emanoel Solano
    Emanoel Solano Day ago +1

    guns are not the problem, peaple are. I from brazil, and here woman complains about rape....ok give me a solution. and they say "we just want respect and be free to walk on the street"... so if someone attack you, what you gonna do? "scream for help". if you had a gun rape would greatly decrease. "I dont like guns, violence is not necessary, education is better"..... this would is dangeous, sometimes you wont have dialoge, you gonna have to defend yourself

  • l ll ll l_
    l ll ll l_ 2 days ago

    This should’ve been about gun control not banning guns

  • Joe Crowell
    Joe Crowell 2 days ago +1

    Why didn’t they invite Steven crowded and Ben Shapiro?

  • T G
    T G 2 days ago

    Pro gun!!!

  • Angie
    Angie 2 days ago

    En Europe we don't carry guns. No mass shootings. No such problems.
    At the end of the day, if no one has a gun, no one needs a gun.

    • Angie
      Angie 16 minutes ago

      +Lizzie Allen Is this a serious question?

    • Lizzie Allen
      Lizzie Allen 20 minutes ago

      Isn't New Zealand part of Europe?

    • Angie
      Angie Day ago

      +Ken MacDonald Mhhm... Can you link me the statistics? That sounds like a lie.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 2 days ago

      "No mass shootings. No such problems."
      Heh. In Europe alone, Norway, Serbia, France, Macedonia, Albania, Slovakia, Switzerland, Finland, Belgium, and the Czech Republic, ALL have higher annual death rates due to mass shootings that the US.

  • Tucker Milligan
    Tucker Milligan 2 days ago +2

    More guns equals less mass shootings

  • Tucker Milligan
    Tucker Milligan 2 days ago

    Give ppl more guns

  • Edward Navoy
    Edward Navoy 3 days ago

    Pro gun people have compromised many many times. Not anymore laws, there are more than enough laws. Even banning guns does not get them off the streets, period.

  • Ken MacDonald
    Ken MacDonald 4 days ago +1

    There is no middle ground between those who value basic human rights and those who want to deny people their basic human rights.

  • Ray
    Ray 4 days ago +1

    They really forget the fact that it’s so fking easy to get gun illegally? It’s even simpler to buy parts and assemble it yourself. So by restricting your normal law abiding citizens from owning a gun to protect themselves, you’re putting them at risk with less self defense. The thugs and criminals and psychopaths will always have a way to obtain firearms even with those laws and restrictions. So restricting guns shouldn’t even be a solution here wtf

  • EDGAR MALAGÓN
    EDGAR MALAGÓN 4 days ago

    At this mmoment, what are the rules that regulate the use guns in USA

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla 4 days ago

      Might want to rephrase your question. A gun owner can "use" their firearm basically however they want. There are however laws which regulate access to firearms as well as places you can have them. Those can vary from State to State however. At the Federal level however there are laws concerning purchase/sales and ownership as well as transportation across State lines. So you need to be more specific.

  • Lisa Leyendekker
    Lisa Leyendekker 4 days ago

    Taking guns away does not stop bad people from doing bad things
    taking Guns and other weapons away have historically led to tyranny
    Every Gun Show makes you take a background check regardless of how rich you are.
    fully Automatic weapons have been taken off the market by the government in the 1980s and the Tommy gun was banned from the market in 1935.
    for those who don't know the difference, semi-automatic means one trigger pull= one bullet shoots out while automatic means one trigger pull=multiple bullets spray out.
    the majority of mass shootings are done with handguns/pistols, not rifles.

  • Robininthehood
    Robininthehood 4 days ago

    Anyone ever wonder why they only want to restrict and or remove our second amendment rights?

    • Robininthehood
      Robininthehood 7 minutes ago

      +Lizzie Allen it seems that they do want to remove the 2nd amendment or at least circumvent it

    • Lizzie Allen
      Lizzie Allen 18 minutes ago

      They don't, they just know when that one's gone, they can get rid of the rest.

  • Matthew Streib
    Matthew Streib 4 days ago +1

    I am pro gun. The fact is that banning something makes it worse. This is due to the reason that whenever something gets banned, all it does is create a black market for it. This would happen with guns. And let me ask u, do u think there would be MORE gun violence if guns were “banned”. I do because then the bad peoples with horrible intent would be more violent cause the6 know that no one else has a gun to defend themselves with.

  • Fried Chicken
    Fried Chicken 5 days ago +6

    I’m done with this. The definition of a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws. Gun laws will only affect law abiding citizens and leave them defenseless.

  • Ryan Sullivan
    Ryan Sullivan 5 days ago

    i wish the people that were pro gun were actually well versed on the subject, many NOT ALL of the people in this video know very little about gun violence, self defense, and its a shame the pro gun side was so unknowledgable

  • TheTravelingSoldier
    TheTravelingSoldier 5 days ago

    They completely blow over the reason for the 2nd amendment

  • Thaddeus Sampsel
    Thaddeus Sampsel 6 days ago

    im glad im not the only one who thought he looked like rick

  • FBI
    FBI 6 days ago +1

    Of course the black person is pro-gun smh

    • Lizzie Allen
      Lizzie Allen 18 minutes ago

      +Ken MacDonald Been that way ever since the black codes.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago +1

      Typical democrat, trying to deny blacks their basic human rights.

    • Andrea Mendenhall
      Andrea Mendenhall 4 days ago

      FBI 🙄

  • Laiman Tukumoeatu
    Laiman Tukumoeatu 6 days ago

    If you make them illegal only criminals and the governments will have arms...how will law abiding citizens be able to protect themselves? With butter knives??

  • francisco rocha
    francisco rocha 6 days ago +1

    In my case I come from a country who's weapons are not allowed(Portugal) and I I'm not a minority so I never needed the use of a gun to protect myself. But my reality is that Portugal isn't a violent country and I don't know how it is in the USA because the mass shootings weren't with my people so I didn't feel it in my skin. But at the end of the day I think people should be able to protect themselves. Y would really like to hear you perspectives so pls comment because comunication is key to not having violence

  • ZX6 RIDER
    ZX6 RIDER 6 days ago +2

    I honestly believe that if you take guns out of legal owners hands (or everyone’s hands) how would police protect and serve? What about individuals who hunt for food? The reason guns are legal is because it provides checks and balances in regards of a government going rogue.. I do not wish to hurt anyone that is not a threat. But at the same time legal and responsible gun owners should protect those who can’t protect themselves as well. I have made peace with the other side of the argument of the anti gun perspective. The presence of a gun (not necessarily using a gun to defend yourself) will help a lot of individuals think twice about there choice to harm others. I love you all and may God bless you in your future journeys in life. Good topic...

  • Sage Park
    Sage Park 6 days ago

    America can't solve this problem as long as there are millions of people making money in fire-arms industry.

    • Lizzie Allen
      Lizzie Allen 17 minutes ago

      Guns aren't the problem, people are. Ban people.

    • Sage Park
      Sage Park 4 days ago

      +Ken MacDonald Sorry pal, but at this moment nobody in this world is more obsessed with subjugating others than Americans.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      The only problem is ignorant people like you who want to subjugate the American people.

  • Violet
    Violet 6 days ago

    He yo just a suggestion, the crime would go down greatly if there were no guns. I’m not saying all crime would go down but a lot would go down.

    • Violet
      Violet 4 days ago

      Ken MacDonald do you say that violence was staggering before guns? You realize the first gun was made on 1364, so in case you don’t know there isn’t much factual evidence that was before 1364. So you really don’t know how violence could be back then, there are secondary documents and stuff but it’s secondary and most secondary sources aren’t that accurate compared to a first hand.
      And you say that they prevent a lot of violence. Alright I’ll kind of agree to that to an extent, how about school shoots? Mass shootings? Murders 67% of single homicide cases are used by firearms and if there are multiple victims Is 79%. So it’s not always to prevent violence. So I’ll go with what we both say and say it’s half and half.
      Yeah but too many wrong people have guns. I’m ok with guns to an extent I really think the process to have a gun should be way more complicated then how it is now. Too many mentally unstable people have guns. So I highly disagree with guns but I will go to an extent that some people should have then if you are qualified.
      Wait tf. When did I say “government employees” oh wait I kind of did but I mean like police officials or like detectives who’s main job is to protect people or like people in the military because obviously 😂. Government officials like a major or like the president shouldn’t have guns either. Only people who there main job should be allowed guns.
      It really don’t feel like repeating myself because typing makes my hand cramp up so I’ll shorten up what I said earlier. It was 1364 there isn’t much factual first hand evidence from before that.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      +Violet "guns have been around for centuries"
      Sure. And in short supply till relatively recently. Before guns, rates of violence were staggering. As guns became more available, rates of violence declined.
      "So no one really knows what it would be like without guns."
      Is this serious? Are you saying that historical scholarship isn't a thing and there's no way to know what happened in the past?
      "And guns create lots of violence"
      False. Guns PREVENT a lot of violence.
      "I’m saying that like officers or people in the police branch should have guns to protect"
      Of course. Protection is the primary reason it's a right for EVERYONE.
      "I just don’t think anyone should be able to get a gun"
      Government employees killed hundreds of millions of people in the twentieth century and you're saying it's safer to make sure only government employees have guns? Of course, that's the type of grossly ignorant statement I would expect someone to say who said "no one really knows what it would be like without guns".
      The historical record is clear: increased rates of gun ownership dramatically lowers rates of violence.

    • Violet
      Violet 4 days ago

      Ken MacDonald guns have been around for centuries. So no one really knows what it would be like without guns. And guns create lots of violence, I’m saying that like officers or people in the police branch should have guns to protect , I just don’t think anyone should be able to get a gun

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      +Violet "Your basically saying that gun laws are making crime"
      Keeping law abiding citizens defenseless against the predators among us increases violent crime.

  • Makey O
    Makey O 7 days ago

    Have all the guns you want, it's your right after all. Even take it to some places where its a good environment for it, where you know somebody else can't get hurt. BUT don't take it to public areas, don't take it to schools, clubs, etc. or walk on the public street with it, that's how "accident" can happen.​

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 7 days ago +1

      Having guns in public places by people who know how to use them is exactly what we need to stop mass shooters. I'm proud to be attending a school where I can carry my gun.

  • Cesar Cruz
    Cesar Cruz 7 days ago +5

    *1776 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR GUNS* !!!!!

  • JJC
    JJC 7 days ago +2

    But if there was a massive truck massacre would we talk about truck control?

  • Iran Smith
    Iran Smith 7 days ago +2

    Thought dude in the thumbnail was Quavo

  • Makenzie Fugate
    Makenzie Fugate 7 days ago

    You can’t just get a gun at a gun show because you have money unless it’s an illegal gun show you have to do the same background check as if you were in a store

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 7 days ago

      Not true in all cases. Depends on who is selling the gun and where you're buying

  • Diana Martinez
    Diana Martinez 7 days ago +1

    PRO- GUN!!

  • Oh Yea Yea
    Oh Yea Yea 7 days ago +2

    Do they not know most people who commit crimes with guns buy them illegally 😂

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 4 days ago

      +Ken MacDonald No actually. Most crimes are done with legally possessed firearms. You didn't do any research. In fact, only 28% of gun related homicides and mass shootings are done with an illegally purchased firearm.
      Most guns used in crime may be illegal for the person carrying them, but are not illegal theselves.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      +TombWraith Not even remotely true. Most gun crimes are committed with illegally possessed guns. Something like over 90% of all gun murders are with illegally possessed guns.

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 7 days ago

      Thats actually not true. Most gun crimes are performed with legally obtained firearms.

  • Amelie Kurlander
    Amelie Kurlander 8 days ago

    Guns are such a primitive weapon -how about a dagger,spear,bow and arrow.People just lazy.There are other ways to defend yourself...

  • Raphael Perluiz
    Raphael Perluiz 8 days ago +3

    I am from a country where weapons are restricted to police only, and we possess the highest homicide rate by people in the world, in my country died more people than the war of Iraq and Afghanistan together

  • Itz Echo
    Itz Echo 8 days ago +1

    Why do they think law abiding citizens are the main reason for illegal gun use 🙆‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla 7 days ago

      People are like electricity = they follow the path of least resistance. Accordingly to (correctly) lay the gun violence issue on the doorstep of suicide and criminality rather than legal usage would force the gun control advocates to address the social problems which drive those suicides and that criminality. Naturally they do not want to open that can of worms. So they instead incrementally try to limit legal access to firearms - which of course does not impact criminals who do not follow the law in any tangible fashion = so that they can thump their chests and say they are trying to deal with the issue. It is always easier to attack a "foil" than deal with real people and problems.

  • a archie
    a archie 8 days ago

    You think I should go through the same bureaucratic nonsense to be allowed to defend myself that I do to legally drive? Screw you.

  • WÀBZ
    WÀBZ 8 days ago +2

    I think a shooter is gonna get a gun weather be it in a legal or illegal way.. just my opinion

  • a archie
    a archie 8 days ago

    Driving a car is not a right

  • Öykü Elif Öztürk

    ... Americans

  • meikäpoika tv
    meikäpoika tv 8 days ago

    Im from Finland and take my advise people of usa NEVER give up your guns, NEVER, its right that every man and woman on earth should have (criminals and psykos not included obiviously)

    • meikäpoika tv
      meikäpoika tv 5 days ago

      +Annika Langstrumpf Its right to own a gun not need to own a gun

    • Annika Langstrumpf
      Annika Langstrumpf 6 days ago

      Why ? Why do you need a gun? I Never had to use a gun in my whole life and i don‘t believe i will. I‘m from germany and i feel very safe through gun districtions. I would feel very concerned if everyone would have a gun.

  • meikäpoika tv
    meikäpoika tv 8 days ago

    One thing 2nd amandent

  • Jeffry Glasgow
    Jeffry Glasgow 8 days ago +1

    All gun laws and background checks are infringements. And they've never stopped a criminal.

  • Prince of Chetarria
    Prince of Chetarria 8 days ago

    As a UK citizen this is such a strange conversation to me - we have very strict gun laws here and so gun death is so minimal. It amazes me that even the anti-gun advocates in this conversation don’t want to ban all guns.
    Americans see owning a gun as a right, to protect themselves and their freedom. But you can’t own a tank or a rocket to protect your freedom 😂 the best way to protect people is to get rid of all guns. You’re so much more likely to be killed by a gun if you own one

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      Chetarria,
      Which is better:
      1. 0 gun murders and 10,000 murders total
      2. 800 gun murders and 1000 murders total

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 8 days ago

      Your homicide rates have tripled over the last several years while the US has steady decline. Sure, gun death is minimal. But your knife crime is absurd on top of your acid attacks and fire bombings.
      Getting rid of all guns protects no one. You are more likely to be killed by a gun if you own one. From suicide and accidental discharge. Not homicide. We don't have a gun problem. We have a mental illness problem.

  • Bald Mango
    Bald Mango 8 days ago

    I feel like they should've spoken more about countries like Australia where they had one mass shooting and immediately made stricter laws about guns and haven't had any mass shooting since, which proves that stricter gun laws work!
    Edit: I was unaware of some mass shootings Australia has had but my point stays the same. Compare FOUR to the THOUSANDS places like america has. America has a problem and needs to wake up

    • Bald Mango
      Bald Mango 3 days ago

      +Ken MacDonald and how many has america had? 4 is nothing compared to all the lives that have been lost to guns in america

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      Australia has had at least four mass shootings since the ban. Stop being such an uneducated toolbag.

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla 8 days ago +1

      You are only seeing what you want to see I'm afraid. Australia is an island nation. Accordingly a person can not simply walk over the border as they can with others. As relates to gun control. It is true that Australia passed a gun control measure in response to the Port Arthur incidence - Australia has no Constitutional protections for firearms by the way. More importantly however is that most of Australia's gun violence - like in the US - is due to drug gang activity. So Australia aggressively cracked down on the motorcycle gangs that were perpetuating the gun violence as a result of the drug trade. They also severely limited access for mental health reasons. So all of above contributed to the decline in mass shootings - not just the gun law. So the gun control groups misrepresent the facts when they cite Australia as they consistently fail to make note of the other things done in addition to passing a gun bill. That of course is disingenuous for their part.

  • Rachel D. Poletick
    Rachel D. Poletick 8 days ago

    As somebody who is very much for gun control reform, I can say that both sides made really good points. But I'm sorry, complaining about a psych eval? Saying you shouldn't have to do it? Get over yourself. I understand not everyone who wants to buy a gun has serious and dangerous psychological issues. Obviously. But the issue is that we don't always know who does. A psych eval is to do our best to figure out in whose hands a firearm could be dangerous. And if taking the time to do the psych eval and answer an annoyingly long questionnaire could stop potential unnecessary killings and mass shootings, it's worth it. It'll amounts to matter of hours of your life. I understand it's inconvenient. But you being inconvenienced for a short period of time is a far lesser issue than classrooms full of dead students, clubs and and Synagogues full of dead minorities, concerts that lead to multiple funerals, or any other avoidable gun travesty I'm leaving out.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      "Saying you shouldn't have to do it?"
      The right to keep and bear arms is a natural right explicitly recognized by the constitution. By the very definition of rights, NO ONE needs to explain why they are exercising their rights. It is up to the government to prove why someone's rights should be denied. If you think someone is too mentally unstable to have a gun, fine, prove it. The burden of proof is on YOU.

  • Lee Golden
    Lee Golden 8 days ago +3

    When you carry... the gun is the last thing you want to involve. It’s not like every single incident you just go flailing around your gun. That’s the whole point of conceal carry and taking the class. We know that the only time you can and should use it is when your life is in imminent danger. I’m a mom with a new 4 month old baby. You think that without a gun I would be able to stop a grown man from talking me and my child if I didn’t have a weapon? Hell no. It is my obligation to live for my family and come home to meet my husband and my baby. No one will defend your life like you will.

  • JACOBY4DG
    JACOBY4DG 9 days ago +1

    Btw anyone can just snap and go crazy so even then...

  • JACOBY4DG
    JACOBY4DG 9 days ago +2

    Anti-gun people just are blinded which again the idea was brought upon by liberals. U lmk when someone breaks into your house possibly hurts your family yea maybe fist/cuff him but I like my second amendment for that reason. Violence happens all the time u need guns without a doubt. Big countries will fall without any weapons enough said

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      +Annika Langstrumpf Because of America's high black population. Even so, Whites are still safer in America than in Europe and blacks are safer in America than in Europe. The rate of gun homicides for both races is lower in America than in Europe. Since black gun homicide rates are much higher than White homicide rates, America's gun homicide rate is higher than Europe's, but ONLY because of America's high black population.

      If you're going to chime in like you know what you're talking about, don't make it clear you have no idea what you're talking about, Annika.

    • Annika Langstrumpf
      Annika Langstrumpf 6 days ago

      Then why are there so much murders in america?

  • Max Towfighi
    Max Towfighi 9 days ago

    Azeri Turks vs Armenians

  • Clara Rupp
    Clara Rupp 9 days ago

    I don’t think it should be a right to have firearms if you’re not law enforcement.

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla 8 days ago +1

      I lived in Germany for 2 years. Despite the competency of the polizei = there were still places at night where you needed to be careful. So while police will as a rule try to protect people - ultimately as noted they can not be everywhere and have no legal responsibility to protect you. Sometimes a person only has what they do to protect themselves = and that is why many gun owners prefer to have a firearm. It of course does not guaranty a successful outcome. It rather merely gives you a chance. Self defense is an inherent right of all sentient creatures. Gruss Gott. 😉

    • Clara Rupp
      Clara Rupp 8 days ago

      Vary Olla agreed, I’m from Germany living in the states and I don’t know how everything works yet but I should definitely read up on this more, so thanks for your perspective

    • Vary Olla
      Vary Olla 9 days ago +2

      I hope you realize that even law enforcement mistakenly kills civilians every year. The totals are hard to estimate however as many police departments are not required to report those events. On a side note I would encourage you to read up on the LA riots. Note how when civil order broke down and sections of the city erupted in violence = the people trapped in those areas were on their own. It took a while for law enforcement to finally get organized and coordinate with the National Guard before they entered the impacted areas and began patrolling the streets. In short = the police have no Constitutional requirement to protect the private citizenry as they are there to uphold the laws and protect the Government. That is why you can not sue law enforcement for failing to respond to a 911 call or protecting you. So when things go South = you are on you own for the most part. Something to consider.

  • Hilary Little
    Hilary Little 10 days ago

    Can we stop with this whole anti vs pro mess America uses ANY excuse to put people into categories we need it dosent have to be all or nothing. We could always just change the laws and see how that works

  • The cheesy cheese
    The cheesy cheese 10 days ago

    Guns cannot be banned because of the 2nd amendment, but they can be limited to a degree. Most people who are anti-gun do not want to get all guns banned but want to limit it.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      You should learn what "shall not be infringed" means. If you are limiting access to arms, you are infringing.

  • dale the legend
    dale the legend 11 days ago

    They run background checks at most gun shows and other large where firearms are sold

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 10 days ago

      Depends on the state and who your buying from. Never had a background check at a show.

  • The Poppers
    The Poppers 11 days ago +2

    “Pro-Gun people, please *stand* over here.”
    I bet that girl in the wheelchair was triggered lol

  • Carlos Bernal
    Carlos Bernal 11 days ago

    *i´ve been in a situation in witch my life was in danger* Only pro guns stand up. I think that says a lot

  • Question Mark
    Question Mark 11 days ago +1

    Kids use guns, adults use pepper spray, legends use acid and ultralegends use LASERS!

  • Will Kruper
    Will Kruper 11 days ago

    the guy w the gray hair is using words he doesn’t even know how to use.

  • Color16
    Color16 11 days ago +1

    Mexico banned guns, my family lives there and they leave in constan fear of being assaulted, they have been victims of gun violence and they are not able to to defend themselves! They just have to take it, bad people with bad intentions will find a way to have a gun, or to hurt you without one, but here in the USA we at least have the right to protect ourselves

  • tim Meadows
    tim Meadows 11 days ago +1

    Handshake at the end was awkward.

  • Tip Aly
    Tip Aly 12 days ago

    I get irritated that the one guy associates protecting one’s self with owning a gun. That violence is brought by guns. The one lady who experienced the assault likely experienced it at knife point. All an automatic weapon is, is something that can be used to inflict damage repeatedly.... a bat would work as long as your able to keep swinging it.

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      "That violence is brought by guns."
      Bald faced lie. Violent crime has been on a centuries long decline because the strong ALWAYS brought violent to the weak, but guns can give the weak the power to defend against the strong.
      "All an automatic weapon is, is something that can be used to inflict damage repeatedly.... a bat would work as long as your able to keep swinging it."
      I'm assuming you were dropped on your head at some point in your life.

  • Ali Khazem
    Ali Khazem 12 days ago +1

    Andrew Lincoln is a libtard xd

  • Just Henry
    Just Henry 12 days ago +2

    Let’s remember, guns are used to protect people from bad guys. While they might go into the wrong hands, if someone has a gun they are able to protect themselves and others.

  • Jamess
    Jamess 12 days ago

    As an outsider looking in (England). It’s quite simple. You take away the means and it reduces the damage

    • Ken MacDonald
      Ken MacDonald 4 days ago

      Except that guns are NOT the only means to commit crime and murder, as you, being in England, should know. Violent crime and murders increased after guns were banned. That gun violence and murders declined didn't make the total violent crime and murders go down.

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 7 days ago

      +Jamess There is no country that is not a dictatorship where guns are illegal. But think about this. The states with the lowest firearm related homicides have the least restricted gun laws.

    • Jamess
      Jamess 7 days ago

      TombWraith name me a country in the developed world where guns are illegal and have a higher firearm deaths per capita rate than the U.S

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 8 days ago

      +Jamess Because "having less or no guns" only applies to those who follow the law. A criminal wouldn't care. I stand a much better chance if I have a gun as well.
      By the way, guns save so many lives. Way more than they take in homicides.

    • Jamess
      Jamess 8 days ago

      TombWraith please explain, I can’t possibly tell how you can say having less or no guns won’t reduce the amount of unnecessary deaths.

  • Eli Diaz
    Eli Diaz 13 days ago +1

    Laws will not help anything. Criminals don’t obey laws. When “the man” comes knocking and taking guns it’ll only be from law abiding citizens. Then when there is a shift in “power” so to speak bad guys will be more willing to do harm when they don’t have to worry if there is a good guy with a gun ready to stand up for themselves or somebody else.

  • MechaBlade
    MechaBlade 13 days ago

    Almost 100% sure these are scripted

  • A Mo
    A Mo 13 days ago +1

    That was not worth my time watching at all. Nothing was even discussed. If those were the best clips with the most information you need to redo it with people who can actually come up with a coherent argument for either side. If you are anti-gun go try and buy a gun before you act and spread that obtaining a gun is easy. Go to a gun show or a gun store and try and walk out with a lot of guns. Most states have restrictions on the amount of handguns.

  • Oliver Hippach
    Oliver Hippach 13 days ago

    4:10
    "Lets all STEP forward"
    Woman i wheelchair: Am i a joke to you?

  • [Insert name here]
    [Insert name here] 15 days ago +1

    I can guarantee that getting rid of guns won't stop crime with guns, people will find ways to keep them and hide them. If there were people with guns on those campuses, that might have stopped it.

  • Jellofish D
    Jellofish D 15 days ago +2

    i think a weapon for self protecting isn't gonna cause mass shooting...

  • Andrew Lindamood
    Andrew Lindamood 15 days ago

    Take guns away....yeah but we have knives, swords, metal bars, bats, etc

  • Khail707
    Khail707 15 days ago

    I understand the need of guns and some people need em but I’d much rather it be like game of thrones.. and killings or murders without guns should be less severe

  • May Jarsh
    May Jarsh 15 days ago +2

    A gun is just a tool, the criminal who bears the gun is the real threat, not the tool itself.

  • Tristan Devlin
    Tristan Devlin 15 days ago +1

    There are background checks at gun shows...

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 15 days ago

      Not necessarily. Depends on where you buy thr gun and from who.

  • Redneck21
    Redneck21 15 days ago

    Where i am at they back ground check at gun shows

    • TombWraith
      TombWraith 15 days ago

      You live in the minority (or your buying from a dealer).

  • Ryan Karim
    Ryan Karim 15 days ago

    I lowkey thought the dude in the thumbnail was kofi kingston

  • Jimiya Ottithottathil
    Jimiya Ottithottathil 15 days ago

    Middle ground is listening and mental health.

  • Noah Sosebee
    Noah Sosebee 15 days ago

    Do they not understand if we take away guns no one will have them and we’ll have to protect themselves using a gun

  • Not Logan Presnell
    Not Logan Presnell 16 days ago +1

    This is a civil conversation... we need more like this

  • dollar c.g
    dollar c.g 16 days ago +3

    NPCs who want to ban guns : *exist*
    Second Amendment: Am I a joke to you?

    • omaru.
      omaru. 12 days ago

      NPC as in?

  • Surafel Geleta
    Surafel Geleta 16 days ago +1

    gun education is needed not gun control. congress needs to realize this is a psychological issue rather than material.

  • Christina Hirn
    Christina Hirn 16 days ago

    I'm from Austria and that's probably why I will never fully understand the pro-gun side. Here it is so out of the norm to own a gun (unless the person is a police officer or hunter or something) that the argument about having to protect yourself is not really understandable for me. Because to my mind it seems if there are stricter laws or something you wouldn't have to protect yourself. However, I'm nor from the US neither have I ever had to defend myself so I don't know what my opinion would be like otherwise.

  • Romulus Pollux
    Romulus Pollux 16 days ago

    Guy in red lookin like christiano ronaldo